Acta Marisiensis.
|
|
||||||
Year 2024
Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 1 Year 2023 Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 1 Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 2 Year 2022 Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 1 Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 2 Year 2021 Volume 18 (XXXV), no 1 Volume 18 (XXXV), no 2 Year 2020 Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 1 Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 2 Year 2019 Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 1 Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 2 Year 2018 Volume 15 (XXXII), no 1 Volume 15 (XXXII), no 2 Year 2017 Volume 14 (XXXI), no 1 Volume 14 (XXXI), no 2 Year 2016 Volume 13 (XXX), no 1 Volume 13 (XXX), no 2 Year 2015 Volume 12 (XXIX), no 1 Volume 12 (XXIX), no 2 Year 2014 Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 1 Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 2 Year 2013 Volume 10 (XXVII), no 1 Volume 10 (XXVII), no 2 Year 2012 Volume 9 (XXVI), no 1 Volume 9 (XXVI), no 2 Year 2011 Volume 8 (XXV), no 1 Volume 8 (XXV), no 2 Year 2010 Volume 7 (XXIV), no 1 Volume 7 (XXIV), no 2 Year 2009 Volume 6 (XXIII) |
2021, Volume 18 (XXXV), no 1
Lucian-Ioan DULĂU, Dorin BICĂ, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology „George Emil Palade” of Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania Abstract: In this paper is presented the simulation of a power system. The simulations performed are considering the seasons (spring, summer, autumn and winter). The system has 39 buses, 46 power lines, 13 generating units, 19 loads and 2 storage units. Of the 13 generating units, 3 are distributed generation sources based on renewable energy. There are also 2 battery storage units. The simulation considers the active power supplied by the generating and storage units, respectively the active power losses. The results give the power supplied by each generating unit for each season. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amset-2021-0001 Pages: 1-7 View full article |
||||||
Update: 19-Jun-2024 | © Published by University Press |