Acta Marisiensis.
|
|
||||||
Year 2024
Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 1 Year 2023 Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 1 Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 2 Year 2022 Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 1 Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 2 Year 2021 Volume 18 (XXXV), no 1 Volume 18 (XXXV), no 2 Year 2020 Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 1 Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 2 Year 2019 Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 1 Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 2 Year 2018 Volume 15 (XXXII), no 1 Volume 15 (XXXII), no 2 Year 2017 Volume 14 (XXXI), no 1 Volume 14 (XXXI), no 2 Year 2016 Volume 13 (XXX), no 1 Volume 13 (XXX), no 2 Year 2015 Volume 12 (XXIX), no 1 Volume 12 (XXIX), no 2 Year 2014 Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 1 Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 2 Year 2013 Volume 10 (XXVII), no 1 Volume 10 (XXVII), no 2 Year 2012 Volume 9 (XXVI), no 1 Volume 9 (XXVI), no 2 Year 2011 Volume 8 (XXV), no 1 Volume 8 (XXV), no 2 Year 2010 Volume 7 (XXIV), no 1 Volume 7 (XXIV), no 2 Year 2009 Volume 6 (XXIII) |
2021, Volume 18 (XXXV), no 1
Bogdan BUCUR, Teodora BIRIȘ, ”George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureş, România Abstract: Any initial product started from a more or less flexible idea, or a patented idea transposed into a manufactured product. This idea takes a new development following the study of the marketing market, analysis studies and all we need for technological opportunity, outlining at the same time stage by stage the prototype concept. The prototype variant is again subjected to a systemic analysis that defines and optimizes the final product, as well as the technological flow associated with the entire manufacturing process applied on the concept. The paper proposes a synthesis analysis on innovative conceptual design. The case study presented in this paper shows a reserch study applied on the industrial product for which the patent was obtained, respectively a double compartmented thermos container [17]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amset-2021-0005 Pages: 28-32 View full article |
||||||
Update: 19-Jun-2024 | © Published by University Press |