Acta Marisiensis.
|
|
||||||
Year 2024
Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 1 Year 2023 Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 1 Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 2 Year 2022 Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 1 Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 2 Year 2021 Volume 18 (XXXV), no 1 Volume 18 (XXXV), no 2 Year 2020 Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 1 Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 2 Year 2019 Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 1 Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 2 Year 2018 Volume 15 (XXXII), no 1 Volume 15 (XXXII), no 2 Year 2017 Volume 14 (XXXI), no 1 Volume 14 (XXXI), no 2 Year 2016 Volume 13 (XXX), no 1 Volume 13 (XXX), no 2 Year 2015 Volume 12 (XXIX), no 1 Volume 12 (XXIX), no 2 Year 2014 Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 1 Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 2 Year 2013 Volume 10 (XXVII), no 1 Volume 10 (XXVII), no 2 Year 2012 Volume 9 (XXVI), no 1 Volume 9 (XXVI), no 2 Year 2011 Volume 8 (XXV), no 1 Volume 8 (XXV), no 2 Year 2010 Volume 7 (XXIV), no 1 Volume 7 (XXIV), no 2 Year 2009 Volume 6 (XXIII) |
2022, Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 1
Argeime LOPEZ, Research & Development Department, Daw Bența Romania, Sâncraiu de Mureș, Romania Manuela Rozalia GABOR, ”G.E. Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, Romania Abstract: The common values of a circular economy are concentrated in decoupling economic growth from resource consumption; resource efficiency; waste management; sharing; reducing greenhouse gas emissions; lifecycle assessments and closing loops. With the increasing cost of natural resources as a real EU scenario, industries will significantly benefit from shifting towards a more circular approach. The aim of this paper is to analyses the waste management actions, especially for construction and demolition sector, in Romania in the EU-28 context by applying statistical methods and neural network modelling to find the best macroeconomic predictor for recovery rate of construction and demolition waste for period 2010 -2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amset-2022-0005 Pages: 22-27 View full article |
||||||
Update: 19-Jun-2024 | © Published by University Press |