Acta Marisiensis.
Seria Technologica



ISSN 2668-4217
ISSN-L 2668-4217
(Online)


Română

HomeEditorial boardSubmit paperPublication ethicsContactIndexing
Year 2024
Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 1
Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 2

Year 2023
Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 1
Volume 20 (XXXVII), no 2

Year 2022
Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 1
Volume 19 (XXXVI), no 2

Year 2021
Volume 18 (XXXV), no 1
Volume 18 (XXXV), no 2

Year 2020
Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 1
Volume 17 (XXXIV), no 2

Year 2019
Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 1
Volume 16 (XXXIII), no 2

Year 2018
Volume 15 (XXXII), no 1
Volume 15 (XXXII), no 2

Year 2017
Volume 14 (XXXI), no 1
Volume 14 (XXXI), no 2

Year 2016
Volume 13 (XXX), no 1
Volume 13 (XXX), no 2

Year 2015
Volume 12 (XXIX), no 1
Volume 12 (XXIX), no 2

Year 2014
Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 1
Volume 11 (XXVIII), no 2

Year 2013
Volume 10 (XXVII), no 1
Volume 10 (XXVII), no 2

Year 2012
Volume 9 (XXVI), no 1
Volume 9 (XXVI), no 2

Year 2011
Volume 8 (XXV), no 1
Volume 8 (XXV), no 2

Year 2010
Volume 7 (XXIV), no 1
Volume 7 (XXIV), no 2

Year 2009
Volume 6 (XXIII)

2024, Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 2

Machine Learning Comparative Analysis for Enhanced Identification Potential of Clinical Features from Medical Data

Author(s):
Călin AVRAM, Adrian GLIGOR, Florina RUTA, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology ”G.E. Palade” of Târgu Mureș, Romania
Laura AVRAM, Dimitrie Cantemir University of Târgu-Mureș

Abstract:
This paper explores the application of some well-known machine learning (ML) algorithms for efficient identifying insights from medical data. The study focuses on three specific algorithms: AdaBoost, XGBoost and k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN), in a comparative evaluation of their performance. The investigation was conducted using data obtained from the Smoker's Health Data database, which includes more than 3,900 records with variables such as age, sex, heart rate, blood pressure and smoking status. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated based on accuracy and training/evaluation time. The results indicated that XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.88) for the proposed task, followed by AdaBoost (0.85) and k-NN (0.82). However, k-NN was the fastest in terms of training and evaluation time. Performed analysis shows the potential of ML algorithms in medical diagnosis, especially in the context of personalized healthcare and predictive analytics. The study highlights the strengths but also the limitations of each algorithm. Future research could focus on further optimizing these algorithms and exploring their use in other medical conditions.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62838/amset-2024-0013

Pages: 20-25

View full article
Update: 18-Dec-2024 © Published by University Press