Acta Marisiensis.
|
![]()
|
||||||
Anul 2024
Volum 21 (XXXVIII), nr 1 Volum 21 (XXXVIII), nr 2 Anul 2023 Volum 20 (XXXVII), nr 1 Volum 20 (XXXVII), nr 2 Anul 2022 Volum 19 (XXXVI), nr 1 Volum 19 (XXXVI), nr 2 Anul 2021 Volum 18 (XXXV), nr 1 Volum 18 (XXXV), nr 2 Anul 2020 Volum 17 (XXXIV), nr 1 Volum 17 (XXXIV), nr 2 Anul 2019 Volum 16 (XXXIII), nr 1 Volum 16 (XXXIII), nr 2 Anul 2018 Volum 15 (XXXII), nr 1 Volum 15 (XXXII), nr 2 Anul 2017 Volum 14 (XXXI), nr 1 Volum 14 (XXXI), nr 2 Anul 2016 Volum 13 (XXX), nr 1 Volum 13 (XXX), nr 2 Anul 2015 Volum 12 (XXIX), nr 1 Volum 12 (XXIX), nr 2 Anul 2014 Volum 11 (XXVIII), nr 1 Volum 11 (XXVIII), nr 2 Anul 2013 Volum 10 (XXVII), nr 1 Volum 10 (XXVII), nr 2 Anul 2012 Volum 9 (XXVI), nr 1 Volum 9 (XXVI), nr 2 Anul 2011 Volum 8 (XXV), nr 1 Volum 8 (XXV), nr 2 Anul 2010 Volum 7 (XXIV), nr 1 Volum 7 (XXIV), nr 2 Anul 2009 Volum 6 (XXIII) |
2024, Volume 21 (XXXVIII), no 2
Călin AVRAM, Adrian GLIGOR, Florina RUTA, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology ”G.E. Palade” of Târgu Mureș, Romania Laura AVRAM, Dimitrie Cantemir University of Târgu-Mureș Abstract: This paper explores the application of some well-known machine learning (ML) algorithms for efficient identifying insights from medical data. The study focuses on three specific algorithms: AdaBoost, XGBoost and k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN), in a comparative evaluation of their performance. The investigation was conducted using data obtained from the Smoker's Health Data database, which includes more than 3,900 records with variables such as age, sex, heart rate, blood pressure and smoking status. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated based on accuracy and training/evaluation time. The results indicated that XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.88) for the proposed task, followed by AdaBoost (0.85) and k-NN (0.82). However, k-NN was the fastest in terms of training and evaluation time. Performed analysis shows the potential of ML algorithms in medical diagnosis, especially in the context of personalized healthcare and predictive analytics. The study highlights the strengths but also the limitations of each algorithm. Future research could focus on further optimizing these algorithms and exploring their use in other medical conditions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62838/amset-2024-0013 Pages: 20-25 Cite as: download info as bibtex View full article |
||||||
Update: 18-Dec-2024 | © Published by University Press |